I am baffled to hear that so many Polls now show the President falling behind in his popularity. Wasn’t it just a year and seven months ago that nearly the whole of the country voted for the man? Whites, Blacks, Jews, Irish, Italian, Hispanics, Germans, Russians, Arabs and so on. All these people elected, then, Senator Barack Obama to get the nation out of the economic and foreign policy mess President George W. Bush had gotten Americans into. I didn’t vote for our current President. So I can’t be held accountable for his actions up to this point in his Presidency. As a centrist and capitalist, I do believe the people who are responsible for his holding office today in 2010 should stick with the choice they made.

     Instead they have all chosen to abandon the man in his toughest hour. I imagine since they didn’t get any magicians tricks worked on the economy and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan they feel they’ve been betrayed. That is pure poppycock. What such a mentality proves is many people in this country have gross psychological problems besides the need for a job. Two of the most important questions they should have asked themselves before they decided to vote in the November 2008 election, was,

     1. Can the incoming President undo what he the outgoing President has done? and,

     2. Considering the level of crisis, how long will it take to turn our economy around?

     I don’t believe anyone gave either of the above questions any considerations before they chose their candidate on that November day. All most people wanted during that time was to maintain their current economic and social class circumstances. But to vote for a man because you think he can pull rabbits out-of-hats and in the aftermath all the economic boogie-men will disappear, is a sure sign of folly.

     Many people will have to face reality come this midterm election phase in the President’s stride to complete his first four years in the Oval Office. That fact that many Americans are still out of a job and more are losing their jobs everyday is not solely the fault of the Obama Administration. Again I didn’t vote for Mr. Obama, which permits me to comment about just who and what did.

     If I had Mr. Obama’s loyal voters, I surely would not need enemies. By this I mean, written on the faces of all those loyal voters, then in November 2008, today is shame, guilt, and stupidity. And they are of the mindset the way to rectify the situation is to make him a lame duck. What happened to all that enthusiastic loyalty of 2008? Where did it go? In reality I don’t think it was ever there in the first place. People voted for Senator Obama in 2008 in truth because they were tired of white men as presidents. That is the underlying fact of the matter. Now, for most whites, since Obama failed to supercede white men of the past, as president, they are resigned to return to the common practice of electing one of their own as leader of the country, since they now have a first hand idea what a black man can do as leader of the country, which to them is absolutely nothing.

     There are perhaps a few black men capable of leading this country to greatness comparable to Abe Lincoln, or Franklin Delano Roosevelt. Such black men exists, though I would argue in small numbers. They are not magicians by any stretch of the imagination. They are not deities from heaven come down to teach the white race a lesson about the intelligence of African Americans or African anything. They are just people. Then again, a few white US presidents of the past were illiterate. Others were self taught as Abraham Lincoln for example. Still others never attended a college of any sort, so they had only limited knowledge of ancient history to work with during the first US Congress.

     I can say with pride President Obama should avoid the lot of them. All those who now say, the hypocrites that is, they were wrong in voting for him. What they should do is ride out George W. Bush’s economic hurricane of disaster, and let Mr. Obama continue to apply his experimental surgical methods, for the first four years at least, preserving the current democratic house and senate, as a benefit about the doubt about his faculty to govern. They owe him at least that much consideration. I on the other hand owe him nothing. Yet, I have the capacity to understand far more about how things work in this world then millions of Americans do.

     For example, in Calculus there is what is called, inverse functions. If we take f(x) = x2 and g (inverse of x) = the square root of x, we learn that when x = 3, f(x) = 9 and if we put 9 inside the radical of g(inverse of x) and take its square root we get back our three again. That is, what x2 did, the inverse of the square root undid. It is a neat example in the abstract world of mathematics, of how we can go forward with bad knowledge and can undo our errors and have another try at it in many cases. Thus then if such a proposition operates in the abstract world of mathematics surely it can work in reality.

     Moreover, in order for ancient Rome to achieve the greatness it did depended on its ability to do great things persistently. A few accomplishments happened overnight. But most took decades to accomplish. Today we still measure greatness by perseverance not by magicians’ tricks. If the American voter wants magicians’ tricks they should go to a circus. If they want an end to this economic crisis they are going to have to give the man that sits in the Oval Office time. I said man, get my drift? Failed economies do not yield to a man’s color. They answer to a man’s persistent knowledge and wisdom of how to shape and mold an uncompromising mad dog. Even John Maynard Keynes, an educated English economist, often held misgivings about why an economic bull with sharp pointed horns gone wild, refused to concede to rational, intellectual, stimuli. Sometimes Keynes’ economic policies took upwards of two years to take effect before change could be felt in America.

     No matter what, this midterm election should be about the power behind the presidency, that is, the people. To tie up the hands of the current president because you are unsatisfied with only two years of his performance is lunacy. Instead of marking his report card with F’s, Americans who voted for the President should mark their own report card’s with F’s for their lack of knowledge of politics, and perseverance. The best thing any elector can do at this point is to continue with the current administration in its full capacity, in order to give President Obama’s democratic policies time to undo what ex-President George W. Bush’s did.

     I say to all Americans, “If you don’t know anything else about politics, know that.”

     Homosexuality is an unorthodox form of sexual behavior. Attributes such as love, hate, virtue, and felicity, are interwoven throughout the social structure of the culture. To experience it is the only way to truly grasp what it is as opposed to what one thinks about it from a distance as an inexperienced individual clamoring to know how it works internally. That is not to recommend you engage in it. But some exposure is helpful. Such as, day to day interactions with one or more homosexuals on a colloquial basis. The homosexual mindset is a psychological, more than of a genetic nature, and there are two or three forms of the overall class structure.

1. Devout homosexualism.

2. Bisexualism, and

3. Transexualism.     

      All hold to the practice of abnormal sex. What I mean is the inverse form of heterosexual sex is more plausible as the necessary means of displaying love and affection. Sex of course is, fundamentally, a function of procreation at all levels of origination. Further, sex on the other hand, in the homosexual world is counter to procreation. That does not mean it is evil. But it is not what is most adhered to by most people globally. Yet, homosexualism is expanding rapidly upwards as time pushes forward. What can truly be said about it and its cultural slant? 

     In heterosexual circles the word is mostly hush hush about the homosexual lifestyle. Don’t talk about it maybe it will go away. Maybe they, the homosexual will come to their senses and join the rest of the sane world. It is, in fact, still an unpopular culture today. 

     Independence Day in the city of Cincinnati on July 4, 2010, shall have to yield to the city’s homosexual population’s festival on the same day. But such symbiosis shouldn’t upset nationalists or patriots. Veterans should focus on how the country got its start. Whatever the meaning of the heritage of the nation for the homosexual that is his and her’s alone. Nevertheless, in retrospect, the day signifies historically, liberation from British tyranny, and the natural human right to self government. Even though homosexuals can govern themselves this is far from the true context of the commemoration of 1776.    

     It bothers me that there are so many gays in this town. That may be why I can’t find a girlfriend. (joke) It is a finite culture. What that means is they do not multiply exponentially. Lets take an example, a man and a woman have intercourse and have two children from the sexual act. Then their children grow up and they in turn have two children each totaling four children, and when they grow up two or more totaling 16 and so on ad infinitum. This is an abstract parabolic function, where f(x)=X2 and only an example theoretically of how in reality procreation might increase upwardly. The number of children per married couple is only arbitrary in this example. But the process itself is a natural one with a major purpose. Mind you, that does not mean the way sex is perceived and exploited by the homosexual is any less in their cultural outlook a pure and natural phenomenon. That well may be I must say, but that depends on which side of the fence you’re on.

     I do not support the practice of homosexualism. However, I support their cause. Let me explain what I mean by cause. Their cause is to live as a legitimate acceptable social group active in their own lifestyle throughout the world and as contributors to economic growth and development while adding to the advancement of the commonweal of society as a whole. According to the Fourteenth Amendment’s equal protection clause, I agree they should have that right. Another point of vital importance is they have Title VII on their side. Discrimination is wrong. Both morally and by law according to the federal statute. Again I have to assent. This is a country of immigrants and minorities. All of which vie for the protection of equal rights and fair treatment by government at all levels.

     So I welcome their legal right to exploit their ideals, this coming Sunday, July 4, 2010. However I won’t be there to see it in person. I, on the other hand, will be working on a book. And even if that were not the case still I could not attend as many other Cincinnatians will be unable to. But their civil rights must be respected as well as the civil rights of all minorities in America. Saddest thing today is, this is still not the case. Racism still flourishes in the hearts and minds of many social groups in America and so does discrimination, laws are no laws. Which is the reason for this commentary.

     I listened to the Senate Judiciary Committee hearings to appoint Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court. After the three grueling days she went through it left me even more unsure about her as a viable, fair, and impartial Supreme Court Justice as ever before. Why is that you say? Well, first off, she tended to be evasive on issues in demand of some fundamental reasonable answer. The questions were not for her to impose her own criticism on any judicial issue of the past but to reason from a pragmatic point-of-view. This she often declined to do. Of course it is true judges are, by definition, supposed to deal with cases on an individual bases and not generalize or speculate. But that isn’t etched in stone, as Ronald Dworkin notes.

     Senator Coburn, member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, a republican, pressed her on the issue of the Second Amendment. The right to keep and bear arm was an individual right. He wanted to know her take on the issue. The question being, did the Solicitor General believe it to be in her interpretation a constitutional right? She obviously didn’t want to deal with it or extrapolate so she simply refused to respond altogether to the Senator’s question.

     Such avoidance, whether for the sake of a judge’s own personal method of forensics, or for some other reason, left me personally believing she is really right of center. I could be wrong, but this is how I interpreted an overly cautious need to protect what is expected from these public hearings in the first place. That of, is she, by virtue of her satisfactory responses to our questions, thus deliberates the Senate Judiciary Committee, the right person for the job.

     There has already been a 5 to 4 decision rendered by the Supreme Court on the issue of gun rights in America. They have affirmed, and I guess, their reasoning is based on the US constitution’s original text, that all citizens are entitled to keep and bear arms. This ruling came down a few day ago on June 29, 2010.

     Certainly personal opinions do affect judge’s decision making. That practice can be found to occur in the lower courts on a regular basis. Her indecisiveness to say whether she could rule on an issue of law, without some sentiment of emotional involvement worries me severely. Judges are human beings not robots. The fact that more women are being appointed to the bench, only means gender biases are relaxing. That is to say, men are less likely to be afraid anymore of women collectively deciding law affecting their social status as in the past. But the idea of a woman evading the issue of something so fundamental as personal protection when, according to her own words, quote: “Rights should have a textual basis,” unquote, bespeaks contradiction. I argue this point because the Amendment is written in plain text in the Constitution. 

     In my book, the Second Amendment: The Right to Keep and Bear Arms,  I stressed the importance that a collective right dealt solely with the concept of a militia. But who needs a militia in 2010 when we have a standing army? What the desicion means is, this time the five justices got it right for a change. How would Kagan have voted do you think?

     Will Elena Kagan get nominated? I believe she will but I have reservations about her judgment. Not about her status as a woman. That has nothing at all to do with it. It is about her reluctance to be honest. Ronald Dworkin, philosopher of law has made it plain in his book Law’s Empire emphatically just how judges might decide cases. No reason to be secretive about that. I suspect any reluctance on the Solicitor General’s part to be cautious can only be perceived as suspicious, untrustworthy, even down right implausible instead of forthright. Which is what we hope to expect from such a knowledgeable individual upon nomination, but in the aftermath we get our hopes dashed. Should the Senate Judicial Hearings be more or less inquiring or about the same?

     Life is to short and there are more poor than rich, and US Supreme Court Justices, have to not only be well versed in constitutional law, they have to be well aware of social conflicts as they occur in everyday society. Moreover, cases often come to the US Supreme Court unprecedented. What then? Well then, it becomes an issue of what is best for the public according to Law’s Empire. Or a judge might ask, “what did the legislature mean when they voted in this law? Do I interpret this to mean all were in consensus when they voted to enact this piece of legislation?” Meaning, lines are often drawn, attitudes formed, and only then are sides chosen by judges. What does attitude mean in this instance? Emotionalism, or a better more descriptive word is impassioned, that’s what.

     In drilling her on the context of judicial restraint verses judicial activism, I thought the Senate Judiciary Committee, at least the republicans, tried to find her weak spot. That is, where she imposes her own ideals of what the law is rather than what the law ought to be. Is ought practical? Well, an originalist would say hell no. While a liberal, acting as a judicial activist would say it’s perfectly okay. Maybe necessary, but only when all else fails.

     The hearings ended with the Solicitor General, if I can provide a comparison, walking a highwire without a safety net. I hope she applies judicial restraint and stays away from judicial activism. That is the US Congress’s territory. Give each case its proper consideration in light of the commonweal. Use fairness, justice, equity, and law’s integrity to help make America the nation where its laws serves its citizenry and not the other way round. That is, Americans are made subservient to the law, in effect, tyranny. 

     It is about time the state of Ohio matured. This Ohio legislature, the 128th General Assembly, is the first in my opinion to see urban life for what it truly is. We now have representatives in the Senate at least and hopefully in the state Congress, who really knows what it’s like to have to live in a hostile environment.

     The two bills among a bundle still under congressional consideration are very rational, practical, and pragmatic pieces of legislation. Without the passing of these two vital assets for the urbanite or rural citizen, chances are society in time will certainly be under siege to the violent drug lords, and the rest of the other bad guys. We find that occurring right now in Mexico and the Middle East. You read everyday in the Cincinnati Enquirer, or on the local channel 12 news, someone’s home burglarized by some bold thug or thugs. And in most cases the intruder or intruders has a weapon, and often uses it. Not out of self defense but in spite of it. More so, out of disrespect for the rule of law. If such vital laws are undermine by the state legislature, we can expect more violent deaths statewide, which can be prevented with the stroke of the pen, and a bipartisan agreement in both houses on the two bill’s urgent necessity.

     I hope people in the state of Ohio will join with me in the fight for the rights of man. SB247 restores rights to those under disability. This is only right. If a man has changed his behavior for the better, eschews evil and embraces what is defined as morally decent, than I say restore to him all his civil rights bar none. The law is pragmatic. It is a law that understands from a philosophical and psychological point-of-view, what it means to live in a world like the one we live in today, compounded by nuclear threats from terrorists in 2010. If state congressmen have their act together as the Senate does, there should be little hindrance whatsoever. My worry is, if SB239 and SB247 passes in both state houses, will Governor Strickland read the writing on the wall.

      All we can do is wait and see. But please visit www.buckeyefirearms.org in support and keep informed. Also write to the Governor and voice your opinion in favor of these two realistic laws so vitally needed in this state for the citizenry.

     I wrote a commentary some months ago at webcommentary. com about the coming of the third world war. I now believe the Angels are right. There is tension and unrest in the Middle East and growing. Drugs are overtaking South America and Mexico and seeping their way into the USA. The US economy is sluggish to say the least, as well as economies throughout Europe and Asia. And protests, ethnic dissatisfaction, illegal immigration, the right to bear arms, starvation, all these issues and others have people all over the world pulling their hair out for answers.

     China is now under attack from rising inflation. Afghanistan’s war on terror, reminds me of a function limit in calculus, where fools mistake infinity for a finite number. The spirit world does not lie. They may appear to be apparitions or even figments of the imagination but in point of fact they are not.

     Nuclear bombs are at the core of all this tension. Why? Well, the have’s refuse to share with the have-not’s. This type of disparity is spurring developing countries to band together and aid one another in the fight to protect themselves from tyranny and possible imperialism, by-way-of nuclear threat. The UN, NATO, the IMF, and the World Bank, are beginning to perceive now today that for some nations, they will forego international aid, suffer loss of economic improvement, for the sovereign right to arm themselves with nuclear bombs for self-protection against foreign attack from another nuclear-armed aggressor.

     These events are not accidents. They are preparatory stages of the inevitable. The Gulf Spill by BP. Not an accident. Rising crime worldwide. Not an accident. Killer Tornadoes, and massive flooding everywhere. Not an accident. Signs. Signs. Signs. We are on course for the inevitable.

     Heed my warning my friends, the bombs will at some point in time make their presents anew since 1945. But this time on a grandiose scale. It is high time the world open its eyes to reality before it’s to late.

The Seventh Man

Read the rest of this entry »

     President Woodrow Wilson thought very little about fraternities or sororities. The man’s foresight was uncanny. I must say, had I been around in his day I may have thought him disturbed literally. But Wilson was anything but psychologically depraved. The man clearly had a mystical insight for morbid behavior and its consequences. And even though he proved to the alumni corporations at Princeton University this fact about the teenage clubs, during his day they chose to rid their university of the likes of President Wilson. But I say Wilson knew the truth about what these lairs of evil could produce and the future costs that would result for not constraining unethical behavior. And what we have today in practice in the real world is what Wilson saw at the college fraternity level. Wilson’s intuition had a purpose.

     It is clear from this that these clubs are havens for vice. Vice is the main reason for their existence. One has to bear in mind psychologically these are still children in mind, maybe not body, but children nonetheless. Whether, white, black, Hispanic, or Jewish, the fraternities and sororities among all these various racial and religious groups, I would contend are all the same in this regard. Color or creed is insignificant. The objective is vice rather than virtue.

     Fraternities and sororities at: Joslin Avenue in Cincinnati, in the community of Clifton, are in my opinion the worst of the rotten barrel’s.

     Phi Kappa Theta 316 Joslin

     One of two of their chapter objectives states:

Social     

     God created man as a social creature, therefore, a well-adjusted social life is essential to our society. People must learn to develop social skills to live in harmony and in peace with one another. Phi Kappa Theta strives to meet these goals as well as provide moderate, well-directed social programs for the development of gentlemen in those social graces of good manners, concern for others, unselfishness ad an ease of communicating with one another.  

     I would contend, it is one thing to be a social creature and another to be civil. The two terms are not quite the same in meaning. Social could connote harassment, drugs, drunkenness, conformity, bullying, rape, psychological abuse, robbery, while civil denotes being respectful of others and may connote, respect of the law and your neighbor, sobriety, drug-free etc.  

     In this follow up commentary about college fraternities and sororities it is obvious they hold campus police morally hostage. That is, they use works of philanthropy to bribe so-called law enforcement on and off campus, to get away with their vices. 

     The first chapter objective states:      

Fraternal     

     Phi Kappa Theta strives to assist in the formation of men. The Fraternal ideal hopes to provide the tangible and intangible aids necessary to establish a closely-knit collegiate community whose members enjoy a mode of living that is conductive to the formation of gentlemen imbued with Christian principles and ideals as preparation of living in the world community upon graduation. 

     The above precept ‘Christian principles’ is incredulous. How can anyone equate drugs, drunkenness, all night raucous’s, disturbing the peace, Christian? If these are true Christian principles I would like to hear how they define pagan principles. Further, if God condones such thugery, I’d rather go to hell. 

     Why do they need guns if they are getting an education? Certainly they don’t need them to add to the hazing, drunken stupors, immorally loud music that goes on all night in the neighborhood. In addition to yelling, screaming, destroying stop signs, bursts of gunfire, and God knows what else. If any member of these sick clubs is worried about being shot by a fellow student gone mad, this could only happen as a result of their ungodly social behavior from within, or intramurally. That is to say, thugery breeds thugery. You can’t get oranges from apple seeds, but you certainly can get oranges from orange seeds. That is to say, you can only get acceptable results from decent kids, but if they are thugs you can only get thugery. 

     Some of the most notorious organized crime syndicates donate money to their most beloved charities. (Read about how Al Capone helped people during the Depression of the 1930s.) This is an act of sanctimony, and counts for little on the surface of all the murders Al Capone may have committed. We should be asking the question whether these Greek letters are acts of genuine altruism or just a way to buy favors from University and city authorities. I venture to say the latter rather than the former. That is, raising funds gives them brownie-points and legitimate their raising hell, regardless of whether it jeopardizes the public safety or not, or violates an individuals civil rights. Law enforcement recognizes only the altruistic deeds and shuts its eyes to everything else.    

     Another tactic they employ is when things get to hot in the clubhouses they move into private housing. Display their Greek Letters in windows, or with their Greek letter banners draped over window seals, to draw attention and to acknowledge that they have expanded or relocated their territory. Then the weekend beer bashes begins, followed by drug-dealing, violating noise ordinances, threatening other tenants in the building who object to their unethical carrying’s on. I know this for fact because many of these misfits reside in the very same building I live in, and what I have described above is common most every week and weekend.    

     Such patronization on the part of city authorities toward the fraternities and sororities have created ethnocentrists. The white teenage social clubs think of themselves as God’s gift to the world. This attitude is ridiculous and unfounded, because God is the author of the Good not evil. And whether they are from rich or middle-class families makes little difference to me. One man killing another man with a baseball bat, to me, is the same as another man killing another man with a gun. For it is the act of intentional killing that is immoral, and the focus.    

     The chapter president is often a teenager too, or perhaps slightly older. Yet they too are less likely to object to any deviltry suggested by the teenage majority, since to do such a stupid thing could cause them problems. It is dollhouse-days and slumber parties for teenage girls in sororities rather than preparation for real life, and dense-brain days and drug-and-beer-bashes for teenage boys in fraternities, who by then believe success is spelled corruption and intimidation.

     In February 20, 2000, Kappa Alpha Theta was suspended for hazing. According to the article, Elizabeth Corridan, executive director, removed the chapter president from office but declined to comment on other specific punishments. I would conjecture there weren’t any others.

     The Greek Letter clubs are in my opinion an affront to the great philosophers, like Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle of ancient Athens. They aspired to virtue as the ultimate purpose of man’s existence not vice. This is a far cry from how these misfits view the world around them. But I do contend they [the ancient Athenian philosophers of 5th century BC] were members of the clan or deme. Nevertheless that does not give anyone the right to get away with crime, simply because they are part of a larger group with political powers. If that’s the case how can society and law courts morally condemn people not associated with a political club who engage in vice. A double-standard? Yes, and money is at the root of all the evil.

     When I was in the Navy most of the seamen on the USS Ranger decried college students. They said they were shitheads and stupid. And not one man aboard ship said they would be comfortable with some fraternity asshole watching their backs. I held to this view as well.

     Then too, I also remember during my tour in the Navy aboard ship, an American black Muslim tried to recruit me. When I refused to hear him out he called me a Negro. At that time such a term was considered an insult. And it meant you were still in bondage to the white race. In other words, a slave in mind. When I told him I believed in Jesus Christ he objected. He said, Jesus Christ was a blue-eyed devil. I was so taken aback, I thought, how could this moron know what color Jesus’ eyes were. This is the type of reasoning that emanates from these fraternities and sororities. They are on the whole parrots, not independent thinkers like the ancient Greek philosophers of 5th century BC.

     Could one say with some sense of truthfulness that such behavior unchecked is why more and more we are being taken by character types like Bernard Madoff, Enron Executives of the past, wheeler-dealer banks of today, ponzi schemers, medical malpractitioners, insurance schemers and scammers in the real world? Does the buck stop there? Or are their even more corruptible ventures yet to come? With less and less constraints on the behavior of these maniacal teenage social clubs by law enforcement and college alumni’s, probably corrupted as well, we can expect to be visited by more of the same if not worse.

     Mark my words. Corruption in banks, corporations, on Wall Street, and in general will continue to worsen, as less attention to crime in these teenage devil-dens increase at the college and university levels. You think we got problems now, just wait awhile longer.

     Before Woodrow Wilson became president of the United States of America, he was president of Princeton University from 1902 to 1910. Wilson must have had some very unusual encounters with boys at the university because of his attitude when it came to fraternities and sororities. Mainly fraternities.

     This brief blog is to point out in Woodrow Wilson’s time compared to 2010 not much has changed. That is to say, Wilson sought to rid the school of all fraternities. Why would he do such a thing? Well, according to Wilson, they were thoughtless boys. He told the alumni, as he sought to raise the gentlemen’s C to serious study, he is doing it, “to transform thoughtless boys performing tasks into thinking men.” Maybe these thoughtless boys were the poor white trash, or rednecks. Maybe this is what Wilson knew, and why he set out to change their narrow-minded outlooks on life, apart from racism and ethnocentrism. But what puzzles me is Wilson was in character a racist. He didn’t care to much for blacks or their social problems. And from the above statement he made to the alumni he cared even less for poor white trash.

     I suspect during Wilson’s day he did not see much drug dealing or hazing. But what he did see and experience could have been just as troubling. Whatever he recognized in those fraternities to make him feel it expedient to do something about the teenage-club’s member’s mental states must have been a threat to the image of Princeton itself, he may have thought.

     Today in 2010 I believe these fraternities and sororities should be done away with altogether. Not only do they indulge in drugs and drink heavily they break the law. They start trouble and harass anyone who is averse to their traditions, and in Cincinnati they have the backing of the Cincinnati police. If Wilson were alive today and still president of Princeton, I suspect he would still entertain the undertaking to rid the school of these teenage-thug houses for vice rather than virtue.

     But Wilson would discover if he were still alive today that the boy’s fraternities pales in comparison to sororities. These mischievous girl’s clubs are brimming with vice. Again in the city of Cincinnati most of the teenage clubs engage in law-breaking on a daily basis, that is because they can. It is so bad now local police avoid applying the law to their behavior, rather, they encourage it. As a result, these teenage she-devils avoid criminal responsibility. This is bad. This is bad for the morale and sanctity of the citizen and the city whose rights are being violated by these thoughtless teenage females. Worse still, is the message they learn from such city corruption. That they don’t have to yield to the rule of law. That in fact they are above the law. Most I suspect will as result of going unpunished will end up dead from drugs, or on welfare with tons of babies, or worst, eating out of a trash can.

     In a way I am glad they are drunks and drug addicts. Majority today, are still white and poor, as in Wilson’s day, but, be that as it may, they are prime examples they cannot handle life. With two wars in Afghanistan and Pakistan one would think these kids would be about hard study. Instead they are fascinated with voodoo, black magic, casting spells on people, dope, sports, alcohol, roughhousing at all hours of the night, and God knows what else. Maybe this is a sign of the times. Maybe the poor whites who attend state universities like, University of Cincinnati, whose parents may never have had a chance to attend a college of any sort, maybe this is an attempt to get rid of the bad genes they possess.

     Most claim they are doing excellent in class. I remember asking one white thug, who lived in the building where I reside, (at the time he was drunk) this boy I believe maybe seventeen, how did he manage to attend school when he drank and took drugs all week and weekend long. He told me he got all straight A’s, regardless. You would think I’d have laughed uncontrollably but I didn’t. I did the opposite. I cried inside. For what I apprehended from such lying made me sick. His genes were a permanent loss, and vice was his father rather than virtue.

     The girls are even worse. They lie in the face of truth. That is to say, if you ask them a question about something bad going on in the area they will say they know nothing about it. And then turn around and go straight to the location where the occurrence is taking place and join in the trouble, as if, they never spoke with you. For example the playing of loud music late at night on the weekend.

     This is alarming. A man needs a gun to protect himself from such sick teenage misfit-minds.

     The day is coming for a nuclear war and I can’t wait to see, if I am alive, how these misfits prepare for the afterlife. Most will probably die drunk or on drugs. Worst still, my guess is, they think they are going to Heaven.

     I join with Wilson in spirit and honor and retrieve the banner to rid the country of these thoughtless minded mini-teenage-social clubs, which seek to train immature children to be useless. Wilson understood the severity of such a circumstance. Conventional wars have a solid place in warfare today, and the elimination of WMD’s by the developed countries will never occur. This means future wars fought by such thoughtless mindless teenage aptitudes from fraternities and sororities is likely to spell doom for the country. That is because you can’t trust that your so-called partner, one of these fraternity or sorority types, on the battlefield is not drunk or on drugs from the night before as you trust he or she has your back covered.

     Wilson, in my opinion, had the right idea. And because he failed in his efforts to change things at Princeton they are even worst today.

     There is the likelihood that homosexualism by Catholic priests, is somehow associated with sports. The fact that boys often shower nude after a game, or must change clothes before mass if they are alter-boys, offers an opportunity for these predators to get a look at the goods. Both front and back. The Catholic Church is a direct path to the usage of the pedophile’s pathological desires, since boys and sports go together like milk and cookies. As priests, they are well hidden and less likely to be anything but a good man of God, in appearances. And even more likely to be shielded by their fellow brethren to protect the sanctity of the order. I know this because I used to be an alter-boy when I was a kid.  

     This begs the question, “Are all priests laden homosexuals from the top down?” The answer is probably no. But when the media uncovers one case of homosexualism in the priesthood, it becomes a branding-iron for all the rest including the Vatican.

     I remember when I went to St. Augustine in Cincinnati in the former 1960s. At the time I was in he fourth grade. I recall one day seated in class while the teacher, Ms. Dewel, spoke in the hall with one of the priest. As she did so, suddenly I felt a blow to my left cheek momentarily. When I regained my faculties I looked up and there stood hovering over me the Priest. He seemed to be angry and enraged.

     I told my parents that evening mainly my father. The next day he decided to pay the school a visit. The priest was at the meeting and so was I. My father warned the priest if he ever hit me again he would file a law suit against the Church. The incident never happened again.

    I do believe what is being talked about in Europe is relevant globally. That homosexualism in this country in the Catholic order is equally widespread, and the violent natures among priests are so ingrained and potentially threatening, I wonder why one [priest that is] has not been convicted for a worst offense, i.e. sodomy, murder, torture, etc., than pederasty alone.   

     It may be because the Catholic Church is highly protective of its image worldwide, as men, rather than as men of God. And knowing the Church has been infiltrated by evil itself, the Pope would rather deny any such deviant behavior exist or did exist, than to openly admit to it, and himself alone concede to the costs. Priests exhibit fits of rage. I know that  from experience. So what else are they guilty of? 

   To cut US appropriations, some $3 billion to Israel, as suggested to the US Assistant Secretary of State, Philip J. Crowley, by one of the BBC’s world news’ hosts, is essentially immaterial to the solution of the Israeli Palestinian conflict in the region. Such a foreign policy strategy by the US would be blatant coersion on its part.

     America’s allies have their own self interests to protect, independent of, yet aligned with, that of the Western superpower, the United States. In other words, this is not about money in and of itself, but to amend social behavior gone awry for decades, due to unfathomable ancient religious convictions, generational, on the part of both the Israelis and Palestinians, that has to do with their place with Yahweh or Allah in heaven, due to the Abrahamic covenant, in the Afterlife.  

     Such deeply religious convictions are unlikely to be underpinned by money alone. But by a joint commitment, free of hubris, selfishness, and mainly egocentrism, on the part of both the Israelis and Palestinians, in order to apprehend the necessity for such a positive bilateral undertaking. Moreover, that their expectations should be moderate, while cooperation high.

     Thus, they again, should succeed slowly, but invariably. And the right to worship as one so chooses should be above all respected. Any violators of such a truce on either side should be jointly decried and punished severely for attempting to disrupt an ongoing efford to lasting peace.