This brief commentary will deal with Jesse Jackson and his challenge for the Presidency in the 1980s. But more than that, this paper is about Mulattoism. Well you say Jesse Jackson was not a Mulatto. What does he have to do with such a topic? That is easy to answer. Mr. Jackson did not need to be a Mulatto to do what he did, and that was to run for President of the United States of America in a time of high racial tension, not once but twice, which existed openly among social groups in this country. And… this liberal social attitude is what keeps him going now.
When he announced his candidacy in 1983, the first time, it had been 15 years since the death of Martin Luther King. Fifteen years is not a long time for a man like Mr. Jackson, who for the most part played a subordinate role in the Civil Rights Movement.
Nevertheless, thereafter he ended up the spearhead of his own organization called the Rainbow Coalition, and then ultimately leader of Operation PUSH. It makes one wonder how could the social mobility of a member of the SCLC push all the right political buttons without being the bellwether of the Civil Rights Movement. But he did.
In Mr. Jackson’s case he did not need to be as I said a Mulatto. What he had to offer as collateral for his right to lead as a African American man was his membership as a Freemason, of Prince Hall. The only other African American person to run for the presidency before him was Shirley Chisholm. In Mrs. Chisholm’s case, now deceased, she was born in New York. But her parents came from British Guiana, who were probably brought from the West African Coast, to South America by the Dutch. Under Dutch rule first, than under British rule. Nonetheless, her background was anything but southern, or American. And if you have a good memory of American history, you’ll remember, New York was settled by Jews. My guess is that Shirley Chisholm’s majority support for a candidate for the Presidency came from wealthy white Jewish organizations in New York. Who the majority, probably were in banking.
She was dark with a nose like an African and fairly thick lips. In other words she resembled anything but a European. This means she was not a Mulatto according to the definition of a Mulatto. In truth, her roots were from south America, which made her status in the eyes of white American females, having an intellect, comparable to Europeans, but set apart from African American women, who for the most part were perceived as of average to below average intelligence. And thus were not thought of as capable of leading white women not even to a soup kitchen, and those who held this worldview was mainly the racist, KKK, the southern white protestant woman.
As for Mr. Jackson, his way around Mulattoism for certain was his Freemasonry. He is brown skinned. Somewhat tall with marked African features. Thin lips and fairly articulate. But above all, he appeared to be, in the eyes of African America, Jesus Christ number three. You see, there was Martin Luther King, number two, but he was assassinated. Then there was the real Jesus Christ, and he was crucified. Then came Jesse Jackson. Such popularity, demanded respect among the aristocracy. They judged Mr. Jackson’s affect on the people, especially, African Americans, as a way to promote democracy in this country, and at the same time to make money. Big money. Lots of money. Jews held the same sentiments. So Mr. Jackson got the go ahead with his run for the presidency. Believe me, Mr. Jackson had some of the most powerful people in America behind him, including Jews, analogous to President Barack Obama’s campaign for the Presidency in November 2008.
Prince Hall, during the 1980s was segregated from the Freemasons in Scottland, England, France, Germany and other European countries. And to a large degree it still is. It amazes me that Jewish Freemasonry is also segregated. That means they, the Jews, may excludes African Americans from membership in their lodges. I wonder why that is? If in fact oppression for Jews, as they purport, is comparable to the historical oppression of African Americans, why wouldn’t Jewish Freemasonry not join forces with African American Freemasonry? Doesn’t it seem puerile for grown men to be behaving this way? But what do I know. A woman will call a man a boy if he ignores her, and when he casts an eye her way, she’ll turn around and call him a pervert, or a stalker. I guess we are what we are, and that’s just the way it is.
Martin Luther King was not a Freemason as far as I can find out. There seems to be no record of documents or anyone in Freemasonry who would attest to this. Could this have been a major reason why MLK didn’t get a chance to run for the presidency in America? He certainly was not a Mulatto. His features were African plain as day. But his knowledge of politics, and his faculty for oration was, among the African American leaders at that time, unsurpassable. I’m not intimating that Jesse Jackson had anything to do with MLK’s death or that the Masons did either. However, it strikes me awfully strange that MLK, leader of the SCLC, was not a mason himself. If he had been, would he still be alive today? And would he had been the one to have run for president in 1983 instead of Jesse Jackson, in spite of his strong African features? We may never know the answer to this question.
Also another puzzling interrogative left unanswered is, “if MLK had joined Prince Hall, would he have been satisfied with their reportedly strange rites? Could he have overlooked their believe that God or GUA, the universal architect of the world, as the Freemasons call him, was not Jesus Christ incarnate? That, according to Freemasonry, Jesus Christ was just a man not unlike any other.” But if you believe in a supreme being, according to the Freemasons, GUA, greatest universal architect, you are welcomed to join one of their lodges. Preferably, one not of this world.
The fact that Jesse Jackson was a Freemason, but not a Mulatto, makes perfect sense how he came to be a candidate for the presidency of the United States. Almost a third of all presidents since the American Revolution have been Freemasons, among other political positions in government. But Jesse’s candidacy raised the conscious level of the underclass all across this country when he ran. That had never been done before. The wealthy made more money off Jesse’s campaign for presidency than they’ve made since, other than Barack Obama. President Obama, however, is a Mulatto. If Mr. Jackson were to run again in 2012, how do you think he would be perceived by the American public? And lets say he runs on the Republican ticket as a liberal republican against Barack Obama, as an incumbent and left-wing democrat. How do you think today the election would turn out? Have rich Jews, in banking, given any thought to such a contest, or the contestants? Of course we all know without a doubt who would win.
We now have some idea of the type of impact a Mulatto has in this country. Plus it hints that racism is more refined. More illusive. More subtle. Yet, still in place in this country. There is a degree of decency among white America, and they may be in the majority. And they may be left of center. And they may be democratically accountable, and socially indiscriminate. But the rest, the minority, those that want things as they used to be, before all this liberalism got going since the end of 2008, are decent in appearance only. Further they haven’t forgotten the southern African Americans, who fought in the Civil War on the side of the Confederacy. This helps them to curb their attitudes toward southern African American men. Not necessarily toward northern African American men though.
Mr. Jackson is their boy. Not boy in the sense of a dumb, stupid, lazy, good-for-nothing, human monkey. As they [the southern white good old boys] used to view all African Americans not so long ago. But boy in the sense that he is the pride of southern black virtue. In other words, to the ‘good old southern white boys’, Jesse is a fine man. And it doesn’t matter he is not a Mulatto. As a result, Mr. Jackson has had an opportunity to be a diplomat, in the past, and has dealt with issues of foreign affairs, representing the state department. For example, in 1983 he traveled to Syria to secure the release of a captured American pilot, Navy Lt. Robert Goodman. This helped Mr. Jackson’s presidency attempt in 1984. Then he traveled to Kenya in 1997 to meet with Kenyan President Daniel Arap Moi, as United States President Bill Clinton’s special envoy for democracy to promote free and fair elections. In April 1999, during the Kosovo War, Jackson traveled to Belgrade to negotiate the release of three U.S. POWs. Also in 2000, on February 15, 2003, Jackson spoke in front of over an estimated one million people in Hyde Park, London, for an anti-war demonstration. (Wikipedia: Jesse Jackson)
But he is not well known worldwide. So why isn’t his worldwide popularity as well known as MLK’s? Since Freemasonry is international, and today, Prince Hall has roughly 4000 lodges worldwide, with over 300,000 members. What do you think the reason is for Mr. Jackson’s world image being circumscribed? I’m sure he knows the British has erected a statue of MLK at Westminister Abbey.
I believe we can safely say that Mr. Jackson’s Masonic background may be the most powerful influence working for him. Former President Bill Clinton is still, far as I know, part of the Trilateral Commission along with Former President Jimmy Carter. And may be a member of the Illuminati. Adam Weishaupt, a German Jew, was a member of the Freemasons in Germany, but broke away to start is own secret society, the Perfectibilists, which ultimately became the Illuminati, in 1776. These secret societies do help each other out, despite, racial differences.
Let me include a plug here. President Clinton’s affair with Monica Lewinsky, when he was in office in the 1990s, should have gotten him impeached. But his credentials and friends in high places including Former President Jimmy Carter, the Illuminati, and the Trilateral Commission, would not let such a thing occur. President Clinton, at the time, was just bored with work and home, and needed a breather, that’s all.
Now back to our argument; don’t get me wrong MLK’s private, verses, his public life, was anything but sacrosanct. Moreover, what public figure’s public life hasn’t been that way? From your Presidents down to your local Mayors. All have sinned. And sex is usually the route of public degradation. My interest though is the public image the man represented. And that was one of charisma. Only God is his judge. Jesse Jackson has not been attacked from this public political perspective yet. But his day is coming, when all the private sexual escapades of adultery he may have been involved in, will be brought out in the open for the public to know about.
In summary, things in 2009 have not changed much. Maybe for the underclass, who were of the notion, that as soon as an African American man became president the world would totally change, because an African American man, is somehow a good bullshitter, rather than a bully like the Euro-American man, and for that reason he was elected to run America, the greatest most powerful nation on earth. They now know, I hope, that line of reasoning was just plain dumb. That every country rules under their own sovereignty. That an African American man, Mulatto or otherwise, is still just a man. That the super geniuses are not by products of Eugenics, but products of evolution.
