Homosexuality is an unorthodox form of sexual behavior. Attributes such as love, hate, virtue, and felicity, are interwoven throughout the social structure of the culture. To experience it is the only way to truly grasp what it is as opposed to what one thinks about it from a distance as an inexperienced individual clamoring to know how it works internally. That is not to recommend you engage in it. But some exposure is helpful. Such as, day to day interactions with one or more homosexuals on a colloquial basis. The homosexual mindset is a psychological, more than of a genetic nature, and there are two or three forms of the overall class structure.

1. Devout homosexualism.

2. Bisexualism, and

3. Transexualism.     

      All hold to the practice of abnormal sex. What I mean is the inverse form of heterosexual sex is more plausible as the necessary means of displaying love and affection. Sex of course is, fundamentally, a function of procreation at all levels of origination. Further, sex on the other hand, in the homosexual world is counter to procreation. That does not mean it is evil. But it is not what is most adhered to by most people globally. Yet, homosexualism is expanding rapidly upwards as time pushes forward. What can truly be said about it and its cultural slant? 

     In heterosexual circles the word is mostly hush hush about the homosexual lifestyle. Don’t talk about it maybe it will go away. Maybe they, the homosexual will come to their senses and join the rest of the sane world. It is, in fact, still an unpopular culture today. 

     Independence Day in the city of Cincinnati on July 4, 2010, shall have to yield to the city’s homosexual population’s festival on the same day. But such symbiosis shouldn’t upset nationalists or patriots. Veterans should focus on how the country got its start. Whatever the meaning of the heritage of the nation for the homosexual that is his and her’s alone. Nevertheless, in retrospect, the day signifies historically, liberation from British tyranny, and the natural human right to self government. Even though homosexuals can govern themselves this is far from the true context of the commemoration of 1776.    

     It bothers me that there are so many gays in this town. That may be why I can’t find a girlfriend. (joke) It is a finite culture. What that means is they do not multiply exponentially. Lets take an example, a man and a woman have intercourse and have two children from the sexual act. Then their children grow up and they in turn have two children each totaling four children, and when they grow up two or more totaling 16 and so on ad infinitum. This is an abstract parabolic function, where f(x)=X2 and only an example theoretically of how in reality procreation might increase upwardly. The number of children per married couple is only arbitrary in this example. But the process itself is a natural one with a major purpose. Mind you, that does not mean the way sex is perceived and exploited by the homosexual is any less in their cultural outlook a pure and natural phenomenon. That well may be I must say, but that depends on which side of the fence you’re on.

     I do not support the practice of homosexualism. However, I support their cause. Let me explain what I mean by cause. Their cause is to live as a legitimate acceptable social group active in their own lifestyle throughout the world and as contributors to economic growth and development while adding to the advancement of the commonweal of society as a whole. According to the Fourteenth Amendment’s equal protection clause, I agree they should have that right. Another point of vital importance is they have Title VII on their side. Discrimination is wrong. Both morally and by law according to the federal statute. Again I have to assent. This is a country of immigrants and minorities. All of which vie for the protection of equal rights and fair treatment by government at all levels.

     So I welcome their legal right to exploit their ideals, this coming Sunday, July 4, 2010. However I won’t be there to see it in person. I, on the other hand, will be working on a book. And even if that were not the case still I could not attend as many other Cincinnatians will be unable to. But their civil rights must be respected as well as the civil rights of all minorities in America. Saddest thing today is, this is still not the case. Racism still flourishes in the hearts and minds of many social groups in America and so does discrimination, laws are no laws. Which is the reason for this commentary.

     President Woodrow Wilson thought very little about fraternities or sororities. The man’s foresight was uncanny. I must say, had I been around in his day I may have thought him disturbed literally. But Wilson was anything but psychologically depraved. The man clearly had a mystical insight for morbid behavior and its consequences. And even though he proved to the alumni corporations at Princeton University this fact about the teenage clubs, during his day they chose to rid their university of the likes of President Wilson. But I say Wilson knew the truth about what these lairs of evil could produce and the future costs that would result for not constraining unethical behavior. And what we have today in practice in the real world is what Wilson saw at the college fraternity level. Wilson’s intuition had a purpose.

     It is clear from this that these clubs are havens for vice. Vice is the main reason for their existence. One has to bear in mind psychologically these are still children in mind, maybe not body, but children nonetheless. Whether, white, black, Hispanic, or Jewish, the fraternities and sororities among all these various racial and religious groups, I would contend are all the same in this regard. Color or creed is insignificant. The objective is vice rather than virtue.

     Fraternities and sororities at: Joslin Avenue in Cincinnati, in the community of Clifton, are in my opinion the worst of the rotten barrel’s.

     Phi Kappa Theta 316 Joslin

     One of two of their chapter objectives states:

Social     

     God created man as a social creature, therefore, a well-adjusted social life is essential to our society. People must learn to develop social skills to live in harmony and in peace with one another. Phi Kappa Theta strives to meet these goals as well as provide moderate, well-directed social programs for the development of gentlemen in those social graces of good manners, concern for others, unselfishness ad an ease of communicating with one another.  

     I would contend, it is one thing to be a social creature and another to be civil. The two terms are not quite the same in meaning. Social could connote harassment, drugs, drunkenness, conformity, bullying, rape, psychological abuse, robbery, while civil denotes being respectful of others and may connote, respect of the law and your neighbor, sobriety, drug-free etc.  

     In this follow up commentary about college fraternities and sororities it is obvious they hold campus police morally hostage. That is, they use works of philanthropy to bribe so-called law enforcement on and off campus, to get away with their vices. 

     The first chapter objective states:      

Fraternal     

     Phi Kappa Theta strives to assist in the formation of men. The Fraternal ideal hopes to provide the tangible and intangible aids necessary to establish a closely-knit collegiate community whose members enjoy a mode of living that is conductive to the formation of gentlemen imbued with Christian principles and ideals as preparation of living in the world community upon graduation. 

     The above precept ‘Christian principles’ is incredulous. How can anyone equate drugs, drunkenness, all night raucous’s, disturbing the peace, Christian? If these are true Christian principles I would like to hear how they define pagan principles. Further, if God condones such thugery, I’d rather go to hell. 

     Why do they need guns if they are getting an education? Certainly they don’t need them to add to the hazing, drunken stupors, immorally loud music that goes on all night in the neighborhood. In addition to yelling, screaming, destroying stop signs, bursts of gunfire, and God knows what else. If any member of these sick clubs is worried about being shot by a fellow student gone mad, this could only happen as a result of their ungodly social behavior from within, or intramurally. That is to say, thugery breeds thugery. You can’t get oranges from apple seeds, but you certainly can get oranges from orange seeds. That is to say, you can only get acceptable results from decent kids, but if they are thugs you can only get thugery. 

     Some of the most notorious organized crime syndicates donate money to their most beloved charities. (Read about how Al Capone helped people during the Depression of the 1930s.) This is an act of sanctimony, and counts for little on the surface of all the murders Al Capone may have committed. We should be asking the question whether these Greek letters are acts of genuine altruism or just a way to buy favors from University and city authorities. I venture to say the latter rather than the former. That is, raising funds gives them brownie-points and legitimate their raising hell, regardless of whether it jeopardizes the public safety or not, or violates an individuals civil rights. Law enforcement recognizes only the altruistic deeds and shuts its eyes to everything else.    

     Another tactic they employ is when things get to hot in the clubhouses they move into private housing. Display their Greek Letters in windows, or with their Greek letter banners draped over window seals, to draw attention and to acknowledge that they have expanded or relocated their territory. Then the weekend beer bashes begins, followed by drug-dealing, violating noise ordinances, threatening other tenants in the building who object to their unethical carrying’s on. I know this for fact because many of these misfits reside in the very same building I live in, and what I have described above is common most every week and weekend.    

     Such patronization on the part of city authorities toward the fraternities and sororities have created ethnocentrists. The white teenage social clubs think of themselves as God’s gift to the world. This attitude is ridiculous and unfounded, because God is the author of the Good not evil. And whether they are from rich or middle-class families makes little difference to me. One man killing another man with a baseball bat, to me, is the same as another man killing another man with a gun. For it is the act of intentional killing that is immoral, and the focus.    

     The chapter president is often a teenager too, or perhaps slightly older. Yet they too are less likely to object to any deviltry suggested by the teenage majority, since to do such a stupid thing could cause them problems. It is dollhouse-days and slumber parties for teenage girls in sororities rather than preparation for real life, and dense-brain days and drug-and-beer-bashes for teenage boys in fraternities, who by then believe success is spelled corruption and intimidation.

     In February 20, 2000, Kappa Alpha Theta was suspended for hazing. According to the article, Elizabeth Corridan, executive director, removed the chapter president from office but declined to comment on other specific punishments. I would conjecture there weren’t any others.

     The Greek Letter clubs are in my opinion an affront to the great philosophers, like Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle of ancient Athens. They aspired to virtue as the ultimate purpose of man’s existence not vice. This is a far cry from how these misfits view the world around them. But I do contend they [the ancient Athenian philosophers of 5th century BC] were members of the clan or deme. Nevertheless that does not give anyone the right to get away with crime, simply because they are part of a larger group with political powers. If that’s the case how can society and law courts morally condemn people not associated with a political club who engage in vice. A double-standard? Yes, and money is at the root of all the evil.

     When I was in the Navy most of the seamen on the USS Ranger decried college students. They said they were shitheads and stupid. And not one man aboard ship said they would be comfortable with some fraternity asshole watching their backs. I held to this view as well.

     Then too, I also remember during my tour in the Navy aboard ship, an American black Muslim tried to recruit me. When I refused to hear him out he called me a Negro. At that time such a term was considered an insult. And it meant you were still in bondage to the white race. In other words, a slave in mind. When I told him I believed in Jesus Christ he objected. He said, Jesus Christ was a blue-eyed devil. I was so taken aback, I thought, how could this moron know what color Jesus’ eyes were. This is the type of reasoning that emanates from these fraternities and sororities. They are on the whole parrots, not independent thinkers like the ancient Greek philosophers of 5th century BC.

     Could one say with some sense of truthfulness that such behavior unchecked is why more and more we are being taken by character types like Bernard Madoff, Enron Executives of the past, wheeler-dealer banks of today, ponzi schemers, medical malpractitioners, insurance schemers and scammers in the real world? Does the buck stop there? Or are their even more corruptible ventures yet to come? With less and less constraints on the behavior of these maniacal teenage social clubs by law enforcement and college alumni’s, probably corrupted as well, we can expect to be visited by more of the same if not worse.

     Mark my words. Corruption in banks, corporations, on Wall Street, and in general will continue to worsen, as less attention to crime in these teenage devil-dens increase at the college and university levels. You think we got problems now, just wait awhile longer.

     Before Woodrow Wilson became president of the United States of America, he was president of Princeton University from 1902 to 1910. Wilson must have had some very unusual encounters with boys at the university because of his attitude when it came to fraternities and sororities. Mainly fraternities.

     This brief blog is to point out in Woodrow Wilson’s time compared to 2010 not much has changed. That is to say, Wilson sought to rid the school of all fraternities. Why would he do such a thing? Well, according to Wilson, they were thoughtless boys. He told the alumni, as he sought to raise the gentlemen’s C to serious study, he is doing it, “to transform thoughtless boys performing tasks into thinking men.” Maybe these thoughtless boys were the poor white trash, or rednecks. Maybe this is what Wilson knew, and why he set out to change their narrow-minded outlooks on life, apart from racism and ethnocentrism. But what puzzles me is Wilson was in character a racist. He didn’t care to much for blacks or their social problems. And from the above statement he made to the alumni he cared even less for poor white trash.

     I suspect during Wilson’s day he did not see much drug dealing or hazing. But what he did see and experience could have been just as troubling. Whatever he recognized in those fraternities to make him feel it expedient to do something about the teenage-club’s member’s mental states must have been a threat to the image of Princeton itself, he may have thought.

     Today in 2010 I believe these fraternities and sororities should be done away with altogether. Not only do they indulge in drugs and drink heavily they break the law. They start trouble and harass anyone who is averse to their traditions, and in Cincinnati they have the backing of the Cincinnati police. If Wilson were alive today and still president of Princeton, I suspect he would still entertain the undertaking to rid the school of these teenage-thug houses for vice rather than virtue.

     But Wilson would discover if he were still alive today that the boy’s fraternities pales in comparison to sororities. These mischievous girl’s clubs are brimming with vice. Again in the city of Cincinnati most of the teenage clubs engage in law-breaking on a daily basis, that is because they can. It is so bad now local police avoid applying the law to their behavior, rather, they encourage it. As a result, these teenage she-devils avoid criminal responsibility. This is bad. This is bad for the morale and sanctity of the citizen and the city whose rights are being violated by these thoughtless teenage females. Worse still, is the message they learn from such city corruption. That they don’t have to yield to the rule of law. That in fact they are above the law. Most I suspect will as result of going unpunished will end up dead from drugs, or on welfare with tons of babies, or worst, eating out of a trash can.

     In a way I am glad they are drunks and drug addicts. Majority today, are still white and poor, as in Wilson’s day, but, be that as it may, they are prime examples they cannot handle life. With two wars in Afghanistan and Pakistan one would think these kids would be about hard study. Instead they are fascinated with voodoo, black magic, casting spells on people, dope, sports, alcohol, roughhousing at all hours of the night, and God knows what else. Maybe this is a sign of the times. Maybe the poor whites who attend state universities like, University of Cincinnati, whose parents may never have had a chance to attend a college of any sort, maybe this is an attempt to get rid of the bad genes they possess.

     Most claim they are doing excellent in class. I remember asking one white thug, who lived in the building where I reside, (at the time he was drunk) this boy I believe maybe seventeen, how did he manage to attend school when he drank and took drugs all week and weekend long. He told me he got all straight A’s, regardless. You would think I’d have laughed uncontrollably but I didn’t. I did the opposite. I cried inside. For what I apprehended from such lying made me sick. His genes were a permanent loss, and vice was his father rather than virtue.

     The girls are even worse. They lie in the face of truth. That is to say, if you ask them a question about something bad going on in the area they will say they know nothing about it. And then turn around and go straight to the location where the occurrence is taking place and join in the trouble, as if, they never spoke with you. For example the playing of loud music late at night on the weekend.

     This is alarming. A man needs a gun to protect himself from such sick teenage misfit-minds.

     The day is coming for a nuclear war and I can’t wait to see, if I am alive, how these misfits prepare for the afterlife. Most will probably die drunk or on drugs. Worst still, my guess is, they think they are going to Heaven.

     I join with Wilson in spirit and honor and retrieve the banner to rid the country of these thoughtless minded mini-teenage-social clubs, which seek to train immature children to be useless. Wilson understood the severity of such a circumstance. Conventional wars have a solid place in warfare today, and the elimination of WMD’s by the developed countries will never occur. This means future wars fought by such thoughtless mindless teenage aptitudes from fraternities and sororities is likely to spell doom for the country. That is because you can’t trust that your so-called partner, one of these fraternity or sorority types, on the battlefield is not drunk or on drugs from the night before as you trust he or she has your back covered.

     Wilson, in my opinion, had the right idea. And because he failed in his efforts to change things at Princeton they are even worst today.

     There is the likelihood that homosexualism by Catholic priests, is somehow associated with sports. The fact that boys often shower nude after a game, or must change clothes before mass if they are alter-boys, offers an opportunity for these predators to get a look at the goods. Both front and back. The Catholic Church is a direct path to the usage of the pedophile’s pathological desires, since boys and sports go together like milk and cookies. As priests, they are well hidden and less likely to be anything but a good man of God, in appearances. And even more likely to be shielded by their fellow brethren to protect the sanctity of the order. I know this because I used to be an alter-boy when I was a kid.  

     This begs the question, “Are all priests laden homosexuals from the top down?” The answer is probably no. But when the media uncovers one case of homosexualism in the priesthood, it becomes a branding-iron for all the rest including the Vatican.

     I remember when I went to St. Augustine in Cincinnati in the former 1960s. At the time I was in he fourth grade. I recall one day seated in class while the teacher, Ms. Dewel, spoke in the hall with one of the priest. As she did so, suddenly I felt a blow to my left cheek momentarily. When I regained my faculties I looked up and there stood hovering over me the Priest. He seemed to be angry and enraged.

     I told my parents that evening mainly my father. The next day he decided to pay the school a visit. The priest was at the meeting and so was I. My father warned the priest if he ever hit me again he would file a law suit against the Church. The incident never happened again.

    I do believe what is being talked about in Europe is relevant globally. That homosexualism in this country in the Catholic order is equally widespread, and the violent natures among priests are so ingrained and potentially threatening, I wonder why one [priest that is] has not been convicted for a worst offense, i.e. sodomy, murder, torture, etc., than pederasty alone.   

     It may be because the Catholic Church is highly protective of its image worldwide, as men, rather than as men of God. And knowing the Church has been infiltrated by evil itself, the Pope would rather deny any such deviant behavior exist or did exist, than to openly admit to it, and himself alone concede to the costs. Priests exhibit fits of rage. I know that  from experience. So what else are they guilty of? 

Leap Wireless International is a public telecommunications company that provides wireless services through its subsidiaries, Cricket Communications and Jump Mobile. It was founded in 1998 and was built on the premise of unlimited services with no contracts and no credit checks. (Wikipedia)

It is trading on the NASDAQ for $10 per share. JP Morgan downgraded Leap to underperformed. According to Notable Calls: at http://www.istockanalyst.com/article/viewarticle/articleid/3841795, Leap Wireless International may be in the market for an acquisitioner. If this is the case, than it is likely there will be some changes made in the two subsidiaries if such a deal is in the plan.

This may be why Cricket Communications is resorting to acts of fraud and deception. For it is certain their future hangs in the balance, and maybe even the life of the company itself.  

Also, Leap Wireless International has been charged with inflating its stock on the NASDAQ, in December 31, 2004. (DOCKET NUMBER: 02-CV-2388) It seems,
nine securities class action lawsuits were filed against Leap, and certain of its officers and directors, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California on behalf of all persons who purchased or otherwise acquired Leap’s common stock from February 11, 2002 through July 24, 2002.

The possibility of Leap Wireless International and its subsidiaries colluding does not sound unreasonable a behavior. After all, with an uncertain economy all across the US and the world, Darwin’s theory of survival of the fittest would apply at any costs. For if they are going down I believe they plan to take everyone they can with them. As for Cricket communications, complaints can be found at many blogs about their services and attempts to defraud wireless patrons by deceptive online payment schemes.  

I have reported this to the Attorney General of Ohio and will follow up with a complaint with the FCC and BBB. Anyone having any problems with Leap, Cricket or Jump Mobile should do likewise.

     This brief commentary will deal with Jesse Jackson and his challenge for the Presidency in the 1980s. But more than that, this paper is about Mulattoism. Well you say Jesse Jackson was not a Mulatto. What does he have to do with such a topic? That is easy to answer. Mr. Jackson did not need to be a Mulatto to do what he did, and that was to run for President of the United States of America in a time of high racial tension, not once but twice, which existed openly among social groups in this country. And… this liberal social attitude is what keeps him going now.

     When he announced his candidacy in 1983, the first time, it had been 15 years since the death of Martin Luther King. Fifteen years is not a long time for a man like Mr. Jackson, who for the most part played a subordinate role in the Civil Rights Movement.

     Nevertheless, thereafter he ended up the spearhead of his own organization called the Rainbow Coalition, and then ultimately leader of Operation PUSH. It makes one wonder how could the social mobility of a member of the SCLC push all the right political buttons without being the bellwether of the Civil Rights Movement. But he did.

     In Mr. Jackson’s case he did not need to be as I said a Mulatto. What he had to offer as collateral for his right to lead as a African American man was his membership as a Freemason, of Prince Hall. The only other African American person to run for the presidency before him was Shirley Chisholm. In Mrs. Chisholm’s case, now deceased, she was born in New York. But her parents came from British Guiana, who were probably brought from the West African Coast, to South America by the Dutch. Under Dutch rule first, than under British rule. Nonetheless, her background was anything but southern, or American. And if you have a good memory of American history, you’ll remember, New York was settled by Jews. My guess is that Shirley Chisholm’s majority support for a candidate for the Presidency came from wealthy white Jewish organizations in New York. Who the majority, probably were in banking.

     She was dark with a nose like an African and fairly thick lips. In other words she resembled anything but a European. This means she was not a Mulatto according to the definition of a Mulatto. In truth, her roots were from south America, which made her status in the eyes of white American females, having an intellect, comparable to Europeans, but set apart from African American women, who for the most part were perceived as of average to below average intelligence. And thus were not thought of as capable of leading white women not even to a soup kitchen, and those who held this worldview was mainly the racist, KKK, the southern white protestant woman.

     As for Mr. Jackson, his way around Mulattoism for certain was his Freemasonry. He is brown skinned. Somewhat tall with marked African features. Thin lips and fairly articulate. But above all, he appeared to be, in the eyes of African America, Jesus Christ number three. You see, there was Martin Luther King, number two, but he was assassinated. Then there was the real Jesus Christ, and he was crucified. Then came Jesse Jackson. Such popularity, demanded respect among the aristocracy. They judged Mr. Jackson’s affect on the people, especially, African Americans, as a way to promote democracy in this country, and at the same time to make money. Big money. Lots of money. Jews held the same sentiments. So Mr. Jackson got the go ahead with his run for the presidency. Believe me, Mr. Jackson had some of the most powerful people in America behind him, including Jews, analogous to President Barack Obama’s campaign for the Presidency in November 2008.

     Prince Hall, during the 1980s was segregated from the Freemasons in Scottland, England, France, Germany and other European countries. And to a large degree it still is. It amazes me that Jewish Freemasonry is also segregated. That means they, the Jews, may excludes African Americans from membership in their lodges. I wonder why that is? If in fact oppression for Jews, as they purport, is comparable to the historical oppression of African Americans, why wouldn’t Jewish Freemasonry not join forces with African American Freemasonry? Doesn’t it seem puerile for grown men to be behaving this way? But what do I know. A woman will call a man a boy if he ignores her, and when he casts an eye her way, she’ll turn around and call him a pervert, or a stalker. I guess we are what we are, and that’s just the way it is.

     Martin Luther King was not a Freemason as far as I can find out. There seems to be no record of documents or anyone in Freemasonry who would attest to this. Could this have been a major reason why MLK didn’t get a chance to run for the presidency in America? He certainly was not a Mulatto. His features were African plain as day. But his knowledge of politics, and his faculty for oration was, among the African American leaders at that time, unsurpassable. I’m not intimating that Jesse Jackson had anything to do with MLK’s death or that the Masons did either. However, it strikes me awfully strange that MLK, leader of the SCLC, was not a mason himself. If he had been, would he still be alive today? And would he had been the one to have run for president in 1983 instead of Jesse Jackson, in spite of his strong African features? We may never know the answer to this question.

     Also another puzzling interrogative left unanswered is, “if MLK had joined Prince Hall, would he have been satisfied with their reportedly strange rites? Could he have overlooked their believe that God or GUA, the universal architect of the world, as the Freemasons call him, was not Jesus Christ incarnate? That, according to Freemasonry, Jesus Christ was just a man not unlike any other.” But if you believe in a supreme being, according to the Freemasons, GUA, greatest universal architect, you are welcomed to join one of their lodges. Preferably, one not of this world.

     The fact that Jesse Jackson was a Freemason, but not a Mulatto, makes perfect sense how he came to be a candidate for the presidency of the United States. Almost a third of all presidents since the American Revolution have been Freemasons, among other political positions in government. But Jesse’s candidacy raised the conscious level of the underclass all across this country when he ran. That had never been done before. The wealthy made more money off Jesse’s campaign for presidency than they’ve made since, other than Barack Obama. President Obama, however, is a Mulatto. If Mr. Jackson were to run again in 2012, how do you think he would be perceived by the American public? And lets say he runs on the Republican ticket as a liberal republican against Barack Obama, as an incumbent and left-wing democrat. How do you think today the election would turn out? Have rich Jews, in banking, given any thought to such a contest, or the contestants? Of course we all know without a doubt who would win.

     We now have some idea of the type of impact a Mulatto has in this country. Plus it hints that racism is more refined. More illusive. More subtle. Yet, still in place in this country. There is a degree of decency among white America, and they may be in the majority. And they may be left of center. And they may be democratically accountable, and socially indiscriminate. But the rest, the minority, those that want things as they used to be, before all this liberalism got going since the end of 2008, are decent in appearance only. Further they haven’t forgotten the southern African Americans, who fought in the Civil War on the side of the Confederacy. This helps them to curb their attitudes toward southern African American men. Not necessarily toward northern African American men though.

     Mr. Jackson is their boy. Not boy in the sense of a dumb, stupid, lazy, good-for-nothing, human monkey. As they [the southern white good old boys] used to view all African Americans not so long ago. But boy in the sense that he is the pride of southern black virtue. In other words, to the ‘good old southern white boys’, Jesse is a fine man. And it doesn’t matter he is not a Mulatto. As a result, Mr. Jackson has had an opportunity to be a diplomat, in the past, and has dealt with issues of foreign affairs, representing the state department. For example, in 1983 he traveled to Syria to secure the release of a captured American pilot, Navy Lt. Robert Goodman. This helped Mr. Jackson’s presidency attempt in 1984. Then he traveled to Kenya in 1997 to meet with Kenyan President Daniel Arap Moi, as United States President Bill Clinton’s special envoy for democracy to promote free and fair elections. In April 1999, during the Kosovo War, Jackson traveled to Belgrade to negotiate the release of three U.S. POWs. Also in 2000, on February 15, 2003, Jackson spoke in front of over an estimated one million people in Hyde Park, London, for an anti-war demonstration. (Wikipedia: Jesse Jackson)

     But he is not well known worldwide. So why isn’t his worldwide popularity as well known as MLK’s? Since Freemasonry is international, and today, Prince Hall has roughly 4000 lodges worldwide, with over 300,000 members. What do you think the reason is for Mr. Jackson’s world image being circumscribed? I’m sure he knows the British has erected a statue of MLK at Westminister Abbey.

     I believe we can safely say that Mr. Jackson’s Masonic background may be the most powerful influence working for him. Former President Bill Clinton is still, far as I know, part of the Trilateral Commission along with Former President Jimmy Carter. And may be a member of the Illuminati. Adam Weishaupt, a German Jew, was a member of the Freemasons in Germany, but broke away to start is own secret society, the Perfectibilists, which ultimately became the Illuminati, in 1776. These secret societies do help each other out, despite, racial differences.

     Let me include a plug here. President Clinton’s affair with Monica Lewinsky, when he was in office in the 1990s, should have gotten him impeached. But his credentials and friends in high places including Former President Jimmy Carter, the Illuminati, and the Trilateral Commission, would not let such a thing occur. President Clinton, at the time, was just bored with work and home, and needed a breather, that’s all.

     Now back to our argument; don’t get me wrong MLK’s private, verses, his public life, was anything but sacrosanct. Moreover, what public figure’s public life hasn’t been that way? From your Presidents down to your local Mayors. All have sinned. And sex is usually the route of public degradation. My interest though is the public image the man represented. And that was one of charisma. Only God is his judge. Jesse Jackson has not been attacked from this public political perspective yet. But his day is coming, when all the private sexual escapades of adultery he may have been involved in, will be brought out in the open for the public to know about.

     In summary, things in 2009 have not changed much. Maybe for the underclass, who were of the notion, that as soon as an African American man became president the world would totally change, because an African American man, is somehow a good bullshitter, rather than a bully like the Euro-American man, and for that reason he was elected to run America, the greatest most powerful nation on earth. They now know, I hope, that line of reasoning was just plain dumb. That every country rules under their own sovereignty. That an African American man, Mulatto or otherwise, is still just a man. That the super geniuses are not by products of Eugenics, but products of evolution.